On Tue Oct 25 2005 at 13:50, George A. Theall wrote: > Are you referring to www_fingerprinting_hmap.nasl or something else? > Both are experimental smtpscan is more reliable than hmap. smtpscan is always run; the report is "hidden" in some cases. On the contrary, hmap is not always run. > www_fingerprinting_hmap.nasl you can also get a report by enabling > thorough testing while that won't work for smtpscan.nasl. hmap is rather slow currently. That's why it is enabled in thorough tests. If I understand well, the problem is that the SMTP server was identified as qmail but Nessus said nothing in the report? BTW, is smtpserver_detect.nasl still useful? _______________________________________________ Plugins-writers mailing list Plugins-writers@private http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/plugins-writers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 25 2005 - 06:04:01 PDT