Re: [Plugins-writers] weird Qmail smtp error

From: Michel Arboi (mikhail@private)
Date: Tue Oct 25 2005 - 06:03:35 PDT

On Tue Oct 25 2005 at 13:50, George A. Theall wrote:

> Are you referring to www_fingerprinting_hmap.nasl or something else?
> Both are experimental

smtpscan is more reliable than hmap. smtpscan is always run; the
report is "hidden" in some cases. On the contrary, hmap is not always

> www_fingerprinting_hmap.nasl you can also get a report by enabling
> thorough testing while that won't work for smtpscan.nasl.

hmap is rather slow currently. That's why it is enabled in thorough

If I understand well, the problem is that the SMTP server was
identified as qmail but Nessus said nothing in the report?
BTW, is smtpserver_detect.nasl still useful?
Plugins-writers mailing list

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 25 2005 - 06:04:01 PDT