FC: New Jersey student in trouble for writing paper on 'shrooms

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 08:48:38 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Digital Angel responds to Politech over tracking, implants"

    ---
    
    Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:54:02 -0400 (EDT)
    From: "J.D. Abolins" <jda-irat_private>
    To: Matthew Gaylor <freemattat_private>, declanat_private
    cc: graysonesqat_private
    Subject: FYI: NJ student's psych fungus paper raises free speech issues
    
    The Trenton Times Wed. 20 June 2001
    http://www.nj.com/mercer/times/index.ssf?/mercer/times/06-20-CVQR1QHB.html
    
    No fun in psychedelic fungus
    06/20/01
    
    By KAREN AYRES
    Staff Writer
    
    HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP -- Tristan Longino never thought his freshman biology
    report on psilocybin mushrooms would cause a ruckus.
    
    The fungus -- typically known as "magic mushrooms" because of its
    hallucinogenic effect -- seemed like a good topic three years ago because
    of the wide variety of available research material, said Longino, who is
    now 18 and has just graduated.
    
    But not everyone agreed.
    
    Longino's teacher at Hopewell Valley Central High School refused to give
    Longino any credit for the scientific brochure the youngster created until
    he removed all references to human consumption of the illegal drug.
    
    Longino refused.
    
    A state appeals court yesterday upheld a decision by the state Board of
    Education in support of the school system
    <rest of article omitted>
    
    While part of the teacher's response to the paper involved issues of the
    writing quality (e.g.; the teacher did not think humaor was appropiate for
    a science paper), another part of the situation involved the view that
    school should not recognize any student work to seems to promote use of
    illicit drugs.
    
    An interesting excerpt from the article:
    
    The court ruling also dictated that it did not matter whether Longino
    intended to advocate drug use because the brochure "might reasonably be
    perceived" as advocating or at least not deterring drug use.
    <end of excerpt>
    
    "...not deterring drug use?" Hmmm, does this imply a duty for all student
    writers to actively put in anti-drug messages just make sure they were
    not "draft dodgers" in the war on drugs? <g>
    
    J.D. Abolins
    Meyda Online -- Infosec & Privacy Studies
    Web: http://www.meydabbs.com 
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jun 20 2001 - 09:47:58 PDT