Excerpt:
>This appeal arises from Voyeur Dorm L.C.'s ("Voyeur Dorm") alleged
>violation of Tampa's City Code based on the district court's
>characterization of Voyeur Dorm as an adult entertainment facility.
>Because we conclude the district court misapplied Tampa's City Code
>because it erroneously found that Voyeur Dorm offered adult entertainment
>to the public at the residence in question, we reverse the judgment of the
>district court.
---
CYBERSPACE LAW, PROPERTY LAW & REAL ESTATE
VOYEUR DORM, L.C. v. CITY OF TAMPA, FL, No 00-16346 (11th Cir.
September 21, 2001)
Tampa City Code 27-523, which regulates adult businesses, applies
only to locations or premises where adult entertainment is actually
offered to the public, not where such entertainment can be viewed in
other locations via the Internet.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/11th/0016346opn.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 22:57:46 PDT