FC: American Bar Association urges more oversight of FISA court

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 19:14:08 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Kent State student paper says school will rate-limit P2P users"

    ---
    
    Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:51:20 -0500
    To: Declan McCullagh <declanat_private>
    From: Marc Rotenberg <rotenbergat_private>
    Subject: ABA Urges FISA Oversight
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
    
    =======================================================================
                               E P I C  A l e r t
    =======================================================================
    Volume 10.03                                          February 12, 2003
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
                                Published by the
                  Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
                                Washington, D.C.
    
                http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_10.03.html
    
    =======================================================================
    Table of Contents
    =======================================================================
    
    [1] ABA Urges Oversight for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
    [2] EPIC Files FOIA Brief; Appeals Court Rules for Internet Free Speech
    [3] Pentagon Spy Program Limited; PATRIOT II Draft Obtained
    [4] INS Proposed Rule on Monitoring Travelers Draws Criticism
    [5] Report on Public Access to Congressional Research Service Products
    [6] EPIC Bill-Track: New Bills in Congress
    [7] EPIC Bookstore: Information Privacy Law
    [8] Upcoming Conferences and Events
    
    =======================================================================
    [1] ABA Urges Oversight for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
    =======================================================================
    
    The 400,000 member American Bar Association (ABA) has adopted a
    resolution calling on Congress to conduct oversight of the Foreign
    Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to ensure that government
    investigations do not violate Constitutional protections.  The ABA
    also urged Congress to require annual reports for FISA investigations,
    comparable to those required by the federal wiretap act.  The ABA
    action follows a controversial decision by the Foreign Intelligence
    Surveillance Court of Review and ongoing concern about the expanded
    use of the special investigative authority created by the Foreign
    Intelligence Surveillance Act.
    
    The February 10 resolution urges Congress to ensure, through
    appropriate legislation, regular and timely oversight, and expanded
    reporting requirements, that the FISA is used only when the government
    has a significant foreign intelligence purpose -- as required by the
    USA PATRIOT Act -- and not to circumvent the stricter Fourth Amendment
    warrant requirements applicable to ordinary searches and surveillances.
    
    The ABA Resolution stated:
    
          RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges the
          Congress to conduct regular and timely oversight,
          including public hearings (except when Congress
          determines that the requirements of national security
          make open proceedings inappropriate), to ensure that
          government investigations undertaken pursuant to the
          Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 50 U.S.C. 1801
          et seq. ("FISA" or "the Act") do not violate the First,
          Fourth, and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution and
          adhere to the Act's purposes of accommodating and
          advancing both the government's interest in pursuing
          legitimate intelligence activity and the individual's
          interest in being free from improper government
          intrusion.
    
          FURTHER RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association
          urges the Congress to consider amendments to the Act to
    
          (1)     Clarify that the procedures adopted by the
          Attorney General to protect United States persons, as
          required by the Act, should ensure that FISA is used
          when the government has a significant (i.e. not
          insubstantial) foreign intelligence purpose, as
          contemplated by the Act, and not to circumvent the
          Fourth Amendment; and
    
          (2)     Make available to the public an annual
          statistical report on FISA investigations, comparable
          to the reports prepared by the Administrative Office of
          the United States Courts, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.
          2519, regarding the use of Federal wiretap authority.
    
    The resolution, which now becomes the official policy of the ABA, was
    adopted with the support of 87 percent of the House of Delegates.
    
    Mark D. Agrast, Chair of the ABA's Section of Individual Rights and
    Responsibilities, said that "the ABA House of Delegates has voted
    overwhelmingly to require the government to abide by the limitations
    that Congress has placed on the use of the Foreign Intelligence
    Surveillance Act."
    
    The Individual Rights and Responsibilities section initiated the FISA
    resolution, which was co-sponsored by the sections on Litigation,
    Criminal Justice, Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice,
    International Law and Practice, Science and Technology Law, and the
    Young Lawyers Division.
    
    "Following the enactment of the PATRIOT Act, some government officials
    asserted that FISA could be used as long as the government could show
    that it has a 'measurable' foreign intelligence purpose," said Agrast.
    "The resolution makes clear that any such standard misses the mark.
    If the asserted purpose is genuinely significant, as Congress has
    required, the courts shouldn't need a Geiger counter to detect it."
    
    Marc Rotenberg, executive director of EPIC and Chair of the ABA
    Committee on Privacy and Information Protection, said that the ABA has
    continued an important tradition.  "The legal profession must continue
    to defend the rights established by the Constitution even at times of
    national concern.  Nowhere is the threat more urgent than in the
    expanded surveillance authority that the government has sought since
    September 11."
    
    EPIC has pursued oversight of electronic surveillance authority since
    its founding and participated in the recent challenge to the use of
    FISA authority heard by the Foreign Intelligence Court of Review.
    
    American Bar Association, Section on Individual Rights and
    Responsibilities:
    
          http://www.abanet.org/irr/
    
    ABA FISA Resolution, February 10, 2003:
    
          http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/fisa/aba_res_021003.html
    
    EPIC's Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Page:
    
          http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/fisa/
    
    EPIC's Federal Wiretap Page:
    
          http://www.epic.org/privacy/wiretap/
    
    =======================================================================
    
      * * *
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Feb 13 2003 - 20:43:13 PST