[Politech] Privacy villain of the week: DC's traffic cams [priv]

From: Declan McCullagh (declan@private)
Date: Mon May 17 2004 - 21:00:09 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "[Politech] Ex-CIAers' take on creating one U.S. intelligence agency"

    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: [NCCP] Privacy Villain: DC's money cameras
    Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 17:56:06 -0400
    From: J Plummer <jplummer@private>
    
                                 Privacy Villain:
                                DC's money cameras
    by James Plummer
    
    A recent report on the traffic spycams installed throughout Washington,
    DC gives the lie to the oft-repeated claims that forced loss of privacy
    is balanced by greater security.
    
    When the DC government started installing traffic cameras all over the
    city a year or two back, many protested. A lawsuit was filed asserting
    that the cameras were a violation of civil rights, in that the person
    owning the car photographed (or allegedly photographed) was deemed
    liable for the fine incurred until proven otherwise. ('Guilty until
    proven innocent' supposedly not being the standard for jurisprudence in
    this country.)
    
    But when the case was decided, D.C. Superior Court Judge Melvin Wright
    brushed aside those Constitutional concerns and stated in his opinion:
    "Although cameras operated by the government are a concern regarding
    privacy issues, those concerns are outweighed by the legitimate concern
    for safety on our public streets."
    <http://www.washingtontimes.com/metro/20030612-112125-7552r.htm>
    
    Yet a recent report in The Washington Times reveals that the number one
    money-making camera in the district is placed such that it does
    virtually nothing to make for a safer roadway, being placed as it is on
    "A six-lane highway bordered by two service roads with no homes,
    schools, churches or hospitals nearby."  The speed limit on the road
    leading out of the District quickly picks up from 40 to 45 to 55 mph
    across the border with Maryland.
    <http://washingtontimes.com/metro/20040429-101731-8457r.htm>
    
    Indeed, as another report pointed out, three of the top 10
    most-dangerous intersections in the city are not even covered by the
    government's 39 red-light cameras, indicating a preference for dollars,
    not safety, by the District muckety-mucks.
    
    In fact, placing traffic cameras on pedestrian-free highways like New
    York Ave. and Anacostia Parkway may increase danger on the roads by
    mixing drivers going at 'highway speed' and other drivers slowing
    preciptiously to below the too-low speed limit, anxious that a camera
    will snap them. This is a recipe for disaster that compromises both
    safety and privacy.
    
    It's not a stretch -- studies of red-light cameras have shown that
    panicky drivers are more likely to slam on the brakes when they see a
    yellow light for fear of the redlight cameras, causing rear-end
    collisions. It is easy to see how a similar phenomenon would work with
    drivers who believe they've suddenly entered the range of a hidden speed
    camera. Last year, Maryland Gov. Bob Ehrlich, in rejecting speed
    cameras, went so far as to point out that even the state Transportation
    Department questions whether current speed limits have any particular
    relation to optimum roadway safety.
    
    And that is surely the crux of the matter. For the state has seized the
    monopoly on roadway travel and leaves people with few if any other
    options to get from A to B without falling under the roving eye of Big
    Brother. There is no legitimate safety reason for expanding state
    surveillance in such a way -- and the fact that to do so butts up
    against constitutional protections is indication enough that these
    programs go too far. For recognizing all of these problems and putting a
    stop to the Big Brother madness bubbling up from the state legislature,
    Gov. Ehrlich is this month's Privacy Hero.
    
    ----
    
    The Privacy Villain of the Week and Privacy Hero of the Month are
    projects of the Consumer Alert's National Consumer Coalition Privacy
    Group. Privacy Villains and Heros audio feature now available at FCF
    News on Demand. For more information on the NCC Privacy Group, see
    www.nccprivacy.org or contact James Plummer at 202-467-5809 or
    jplummer@private . This report available online at
    <http://nccprivacy.org/handv/040514villain.htm>.
    
    
    
    --
    James Plummer
    Policy Analyst
    Consumer Alert
    (202) 467-5809
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Politech mailing list
    Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 17 2004 - 21:50:14 PDT