-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 12:47:43PM -0500, Joel Rivers(riversat_private) wrote: > What civil liberties are we giving up? Since when is hacking, > virus-writing, and website defacing a civil liberty? I > will agree that life imprisionment is a little harsh for defacing > a web site but I think that harsher penalties hopefully will serve as a > deterent for this type of behavior. Let the punishment fit the crime, comes to mind. It is not defined clearly enough to limit to cleancut illegal behavior. It could affect computer professionals involved in the computer security world, at least that was my impression. > I'll say that the "increase in government surveillance authority" is the > primary area of concern in regards to "losing civil liberties" in this bill. > If anything, this is the area we should be focusing our concern, not on > harsh penalties for those who are attempting illegal behavior. That is definitely of concern. It is unconstitutional. Regardless, there are multiple angles that must be considered. The infringement attempts and successes upon freedom in the United States as of late are outright disgusting. It is unnecessary to quote the entire message. Regards, - -- \ | \ / White Vampire\Rem | http://gammaforce.org/ \|\| \/ whitevampireat_private | http://gammagear.com/ "Silly hacker, root is for administrators." | http://webfringe.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE7yzDO3+rxmnEDyl8RApreAKCr6eqVo5CfezwxHYY9QrjzhTfpsACdHJ5g vrQznvrL08z+e2fr2XkRJxs= =YwGw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 13:13:24 PDT