Re: Civil Disobedience

From: Joe Shaw (jshawat_private)
Date: Mon Oct 15 2001 - 13:43:14 PDT

  • Next message: Ron DuFresne: "Re: Civil Disobedience"

    On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, White Vampire wrote:
    
    > 	Let the punishment fit the crime, comes to mind.  It is not
    > defined clearly enough to limit to cleancut illegal behavior.  It could
    > affect computer professionals involved in the computer security world,
    > at least that was my impression.
    
    With an already overcrowded prison system and an overworked FBI,
    especially in the face of the recent attacks in New York, where and how
    are they going to find the manpower to go after web page defacers and
    virii writers?
    
    > 	That is definitely of concern.  It is
    > unconstitutional.  Regardless, there are multiple angles that must be
    > considered.  The infringement attempts and successes upon freedom in the
    > United States as of late are outright disgusting.
    
    Yes.  Never let the unconstitutionality of something convince you that it
    will be found as such.  The Fourth Amendment is being eroded because of
    "The War on Drugs."  The Second Amendment is being eroded "because of the
    children."  The First Amendment can't protect you if you criticize a
    Federal judge.  We all understand free speach, the right to be secure in
    our posessions and on our property, and the right to defend ourselves if
    attacked.  But who here thinks that most Congressmen know the difference
    between a SYN scan and a TCP connect(); scan?  Or the difference between a
    buffer overflow and a format string attack?  These people, most of whom
    are grossly ignorant of what is being proposed to them, will be the ones
    passing these laws, and they will pass any laws they want to if they
    think that the people will support them and the President will sign them.
    Sometimes unpopular legislation is tacked on to bills almost guaranteed to
    pass or in an effort to kill them, and nothing is more sinister as the
    "rider."  Then, after the law is passed and people are prosecuted
    under it you have to run test cases through the judicial system
    until you ultimately arrive at the Supreme Court and they decide the
    outcome.  This can take years, which you can spend locked up in Federal
    prison, and which you can never get back.  I may not like Mitnick, but I
    certainly think his case shows that he was not treated fairly, especially
    in light of his real crimes.
    
    As an NRA member, contacting my elected representatives is not new to me.
    The HCI crowd may hate us, but any politician will tell you that NRA
    members are very active in politics and they do listen to us.  The NRA
    only has 4-5Million members.  How many members does the EFF have, and if
    you're not a member why haven't you joined?  Politics is a dirty game, but
    the lack of political muscle is worse.  The EFF sounds like the perfect
    organization for fighting this type of legislation.
    
    Yours in freedom and liberty,
    --
    Joseph W. Shaw II
    Network Security Specialist/CCNA
    Unemployed.  Will hack for food.  God Bless.
    Apparently I'm overqualified but undereducated to be employed.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 14:35:27 PDT