Re: Civil Disobedience

From: Craig Van Tassle (craigat_private)
Date: Mon Oct 15 2001 - 11:13:37 PDT

  • Next message: prime evil: "Re: PGP Signed Messages"

    On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 12:56:56PM -0400, Ethan Zimmer wrote:
    > John Thornton wrote:
    > > 
    > > ( Moderator: Please pass this though Blue Boar. Please just allow this
    > > thread even if it is just for a day )
    > > 
    > > In case you have been living under a rock the past few weeks. You should
    > > know that our civil liberties are under attack. Kevin Poulsen wrote:
    > > "Hackers, virus-writers and web site defacers would face life imprisonment
    > > without the possibility of parole under legislation proposed by the Bush
    > > Administration that would classify most computer crimes as acts of
    > > terrorism."
    > > ( http://www.securityfocus.com/news/257, Hackers face life imprisonment
    > > under 'Anti-Terrorism' Act). When you read the news this morning you will
    > > see that this bill was passed by the Senate.
    > > (http://www.securityfocus.com/news/265, Senate passes terror bill).
    > > 
    > > I will say that most of the readers of this news group are not hackers but
    > > Network Administrators that are very involved with the Security Community.
    > > That is why I am asking you, not to report minor scans against your network
    > > to the abuse department of any ISP if this bill becomes law.
    > > 
    > > I as a Network Administrator for many years now have been on a routine to
    > > check my logs for scans against my network every morning and send the logs
    > > of attacks to the abuse department of the ISP. I encourage every Network
    > I can't begin to count the number of times that visitors to our site,
    > whom just got that spiffy new firewall on their windows box, have
    > emailed me, cc'd to the FBI, our upstream, and anyone else they can
    > think of claiming our servers were "breaking into" their machine.  Every
    > single time this was a web application using a port other then 80. 
    > These go 100% of the time unanswered by anyone but me explaining that
    > they were just contacting us and the traffic is benign.  I can't imagine
    > what the future will bring with these proposed new laws.  Any newbie
    > with a firewall that suspects something is going to become a terrorist
    > spotter.
    > 
    > Quite scary.  
    > 
    > -- 
    > Ethan Zimmer - ezimmerat_private   
    > Director of Research and Development
    > LiveWave, Inc.
    As a newbie to computer and firewall security I agree with that.  Ive seen several attempt connects to my computer on various wierd ports.  Being new to computer security i have looked into these "attacks" and have not been able to find out what the are doing.  But it has not affected me an any way so untill i can find out if there "attacks" are of a evil intent its my responsibality to not report them for "hacking".  This new law scares me as well.  If just portscanning someone will make you a "hacker/terrorist" what about the legitimate useage of programs like satan, nmap and cops?  With the way the government has been watching people in the past (ie with out warrants)  what will stop them form just expanding there power to a case like "enemy of the state".  This bill truly scares me and hopefully someone will be able to explaing to the politions in congress what a computer is and why the proposed bill is not the answer.  Perhaps a letter writing campaign would be a better response to this.
    this scares the hell out of me.
    Craig
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 13:32:36 PDT