RE: Civil Disobedience

From: Hire, Ejay (Ejay.Hireat_private)
Date: Tue Oct 16 2001 - 06:35:06 PDT

  • Next message: dan.ellisat_private: "Re: Civil Disobedience"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    My apologies.  In the original context of the quote, the author was
    referring to a computer criminal.  I.e. one who uses surreptitious
    means (Technical or otherwise) to gain access or resources from a
    computing system.
    
    - -----Original Message-----
    From: Shaun Dewberry [mailto:shaundat_private]
    Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:52 AM
    To: 'Hire, Ejay'; 'br0ken halo'; vuln-devat_private
    Subject: RE: Civil Disobedience
    
    
    
    This depends on your definition of "hacking" and whether you obtained
    that
    perception from the media or from MIT. My definition of hacker does
    not
    involve destruction of property or harm to any person. A basic
    definition of
    'hacker' is an inherently curious, computer literate person, having a
    special interest in computer security. What you seem to be talking
    about is
    a computer criminal. These are two entirely different entities.
    Please don't
    bundle hackers with criminals.
    
    >Don't you think "hacking is a victimless crime" is a bit soft?  I
    >agree it doesn't merit life inprisonment, but it still has an impact
    >on its' victims.
    
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
    
    iQA/AwUBO8xEiQfGUZh0Fm3JEQKbywCg7SyZbGrqEuQpIBE1TiSCnDj/8psAn2ih
    d0D7AW7f52/kVSU5oGf7Q5JO
    =75De
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Oct 16 2001 - 09:57:11 PDT