On 2001-11-21 hush.little.babyat_private wrote the folowyng: [moderator: since this will probably cause many people to start the nda vs full disclosure debate so I guess you won't let it trough. So if you don't, it would be nice to give a tip to the list.] Ok... So we know that there is a bug... It's a critical one, ppl can "turn it off" by editing something in the registry and Microsoft is working hard to fix it. Oh... and we know that for the next 60 days some people can cause some damage to me and I have no way to protect myself. Is this just me or maybe more people think that releasing this "advisory" (though this should be called "intimidator") was completely irresponsible and plain stupid? hlbhc> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- hlbhc> NOMEN NESCIO SECURITY ALERT #9000989 666 hlbhc> Topic: Remote File Execution By Web or Mail: Internet Explorer hlbhc> Severity: Critical hlbhc> Datum: 2001-11-21 ---snip--- -- Mariusz Mazur "One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them" rem begin JenniferLopez_Naked.jpg.vbs :)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Nov 22 2001 - 17:36:57 PST