Mariusz Mazur(mariuszat_private)@Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 08:09:46PM +0100: > On 2001-11-21 hush.little.babyat_private wrote the folowyng: > > [moderator: since this will probably cause many people to start the nda > vs full disclosure debate so I guess you won't let it trough. So if you > don't, it would be nice to give a tip to the list.] > > > Ok... So we know that there is a bug... It's a critical one, ppl can > "turn it off" by editing something in the registry and Microsoft is > working hard to fix it. Oh... and we know that for the next 60 days some > people can cause some damage to me and I have no way to protect myself. > > Is this just me or maybe more people think that releasing this > "advisory" (though this should be called "intimidator") was completely > irresponsible and plain stupid? > > I think the point was to show us that the MS policy is stupid. There's a hole, obviously it can be found, but MS doesn't want us to know about it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Nov 22 2001 - 21:59:31 PST