RE: Wlan @ bestbuy is cleartext?

From: Oliver Petruzel (opetruzelat_private)
Date: Wed May 01 2002 - 23:20:35 PDT

  • Next message: Meritt James: "Re: Wlan @ bestbuy is cleartext?"

    FYI: local circuit cities suffer too, or the one near me atleast... (I
    heard!: they have a lan at the local CC that has ssid "CCsecurelan" and
    no WEP... all cleartext and dhcp... rumor though=not MY findings!)
    perhaps just a demo wlan...?
    
    /oliver p.
    
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieksat_private] 
    Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:27 AM
    To: Jonathan Bloomquist
    Cc: vuln-devat_private
    Subject: Re: Wlan @ bestbuy is cleartext? 
    
    On Wed, 01 May 2002 18:21:23 PDT, Jonathan Bloomquist said:
    > Corporate IT staff are paid to know better than to put
    > insecure technology into production and they need to
    > be held accountable if they make such a boneheaded
    > move.
    
    How many corporate networks have dumped Outlook so far?
    
    How many corporate sites still run IIS because a conversion to
    Apache would be even more costly than getting hacked every 2 months?
    
    It's *quite* possible that at least some of these IT staffers did
    the calculation: "Hmm... if we deploy this, we can expect $2M/year in
    writeoffs due to guys out in the parking lot with pringle-can yagis, but
    we'll save $4M/year, so we'll be ahead anyhow..."  It's all trade-offs,
    and nothing news to the big corporations - I'm *positive* that the
    master
    financial plan for Best Buy already has a line item for "write off 2.3%
    of all credit card transactions" and that such write-offs are a standard
    part of doing business.  They may decide that it's easier and cheaper to
    just raise their write-off margin to 2.7% rather than fix the
    problem....
    
    And factor *THIS* into the equation - let's say that Very Large Chain
    Q-Mart decides to run wireless without any security.  Perhaps they had
    a *reason*.  Like - if any security is disabled, you can deploy devices
    that can hop onto the net without any assistance - so it's safe to give
    these handheld scanners/etc to a $7/hour functional illiterate.  On the
    other hand, if security is enabled, it's quite possible for the device
    to get confused and be unable to talk.  This not only means that you've
    just idled the $7/hour worker until it's fixed, it means you need to
    find
    an actual *literate* and *competent* person, who's probably costing you
    a lot MORE than $7/hour, to unsnarl the mess and figure out what
    happened.
    
    				Valdis Kletnieks
    				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
    				Virginia Tech
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 02 2002 - 08:43:21 PDT