>The law is what they can get away with. Since monitoring of a wireless >network is passive, how can you prove that they listened in? (Since >courts can now accept spectral evidence in cases of "national security" >(especially when monitoring foreign nationals), you would never see what >they held against you.) We must note, also, that the definitions of "terrorism" and "national security" as used by the Justice Department now include small scale drug trafficking, simple fraud, and money laundering.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 15 2003 - 15:40:39 PDT