On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Mikael Olsson wrote: > > Mikael Olsson wrote: > > They're not even remotely related. > > [...] > > (Of course, the protocol structs differs entirely too; this is > > just the most obvious way of showing the difference.) > > > Richard Sharpe wrote: > > > > Hmmm, I don't want to make a lot of game-show like noises, but there are > > similarities between DNS requests and NetBIOS name requests, however, the > > RFC1001/RFC1002 people did choose a really weird encoding for names. > > *cough* did I really write that? Yes, the basic DNS protocol structs > are the same. I think I meant to say that the resource record (type) > structs differ entirely or something like that. Or maybe my brain > just short circuited (which would explain why I wrote 'not even > remotely' related.) > > Anyway, the point is that (as far as I know) you can't use normal > DNS tools to exchange netbios RRs. ( ... right? :) ) I agree. Regards ----- Richard Sharpe, rsharpeat_private, rsharpeat_private, sharpeat_private, http://www.richardsharpe.com _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizardsat_private http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 14 2002 - 13:11:37 PDT