Re: A question for the list...

From: Brian Finn (brianat_private)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 11:56:55 PDT

  • Next message: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: Scans from proxyprotector.com"

    So, who are the network police?
    
    Brian
    
    On Wed, 21 May 2003, Kevin Reardon wrote:
    
    > Please keep these discussions directed toward the email list, it's
    > supposed to be a general conversation.
    > 
    > Ignorance of the Law is no excuse, but it does not imply a mandatory use
    > of vigilantism as a response.  In the case where a landlord is notified
    > and they do nothing, the police and regional prosecutors will have
    > something to say about it.  If the neighbor, on the other hand, responds
    > in some manner, even if it is the same response the police would do,
    > they would be guilty of several offenses (and rightly so because it
    > would not be the actions of a "reasonable man").  Again, we use police
    > to enforce the laws, removing the burden (and hopefully the arbitrary
    > reactions of vigilantism) from the general users of society.
    > 
    > ---K 
    > 
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper ***
    Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies 
    that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats. 
    Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs.
    
    To get your FREE white paper visit us at:    
    http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 22 2003 - 12:17:54 PDT