They don't exist. Nothing like that exists at all. It would require treaties and guns (not to mention the unfortunate folks behind the guns). ---K Brian Finn wrote: > So, who are the network police? > > Brian > > On Wed, 21 May 2003, Kevin Reardon wrote: > > > Please keep these discussions directed toward the email list, it's > > supposed to be a general conversation. > > > > Ignorance of the Law is no excuse, but it does not imply a mandatory use > > of vigilantism as a response. In the case where a landlord is notified > > and they do nothing, the police and regional prosecutors will have > > something to say about it. If the neighbor, on the other hand, responds > > in some manner, even if it is the same response the police would do, > > they would be guilty of several offenses (and rightly so because it > > would not be the actions of a "reasonable man"). Again, we use police > > to enforce the laws, removing the burden (and hopefully the arbitrary > > reactions of vigilantism) from the general users of society. > > > > ---K > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper *** Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats. Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs. To get your FREE white paper visit us at: http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri May 23 2003 - 09:56:20 PDT