Re: Scan of TCP 552-554

From: Rodrigo Barbosa (rodrigobat_private)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 17:10:19 PDT

Next message: Anthony Clendenen: "RE: WORM_MIMAIL.A Anyone have any info on what this does yet?"

Previous message: gil.youngat_private: "RE: WORM_MIMAIL.A Anyone have any info on what this does yet?"
In reply to: Dave Paris: "RE: Scan of TCP 552-554"
Next in thread: Dave Paris: "Re: Scan of TCP 552-554"
Reply: Dave Paris: "Re: Scan of TCP 552-554"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:31:26PM -0400, Dave Paris wrote:
> Not to point out the wholly obvious or anything, but...
> 
> Regardless of your response to the portscan, by the time you react it has
> already "used your link" and cost you bandwidth.

You are MOSTLY correct. But I have had cases where someone kept
portscanning me for almost a week.

-- 
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigobat_private>
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Next message: Anthony Clendenen: "RE: WORM_MIMAIL.A Anyone have any info on what this does yet?"
Previous message: gil.youngat_private: "RE: WORM_MIMAIL.A Anyone have any info on what this does yet?"
In reply to: Dave Paris: "RE: Scan of TCP 552-554"
Next in thread: Dave Paris: "Re: Scan of TCP 552-554"
Reply: Dave Paris: "Re: Scan of TCP 552-554"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Aug 03 2003 - 08:52:52 PDT