On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Amon Ott wrote: > On Don, 19 Apr 2001 buddy wrote: > > Now, the only thing I'm trying to say here, is that nobody seems to care about the > > reason *why* you would want to hook into, say, sys_fork(). There has been no > > discussion about the actual threats and insecurities that we want to cover. > > On GACI list, I already posted the a list of RSBAC hooks with some reasons and > call chains. I attached a slightly reworked version. GACI reallay do a good job, I think this security modules interface can benifit from what GACI had done. -Huagang -- Happy Hacking LIDS secure linux kernel http://www.lids.org/ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 19 2001 - 04:18:48 PDT