Crispin Cowan wrote: >On the "needs a new system call" issue: what do people think of proposing >that a block of syscall numbers be allocated to LSM? Good question. Well, I must admit my first reaction is to be skeptical. First question: What is it needed for? The canonical way to add new ways to interact with the OS is usually not to add a new syscall, but rather to add an entry in /proc or somesuch. (or at worst add an ioctl() -- ugh!) What cases isn't this good enough for? _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 22:12:43 PDT