On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Crispin Cowan wrote: > * capabilities: coarse-grained, authoritative > * others: fine-grained, restrictive ... > > Permissiveness: never, except in support of capabilities. > Yes, I was here for that discussion. Thank you for a most elegantly definitive reduction of the resulting majority consensus. I believe it was needed... with so many animated opinions being expressed and some references to extra-list discussions (such as the BoF meeting) it is sometimes difficult to determine exactly where the consensus has arrived without just such a statement of resolution to "cap it off". It helps to have a "Clue Stick" that everybody can lift. :-) Sincerely, J. Melvin Jones |>------------------------------------------------------ || J. MELVIN JONES jmjonesat_private |>------------------------------------------------------ || Microcomputer Systems Consultant || Software Developer || Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration || Network and Systems Administration |>------------------------------------------------------ || http://www.jmjones.com/ |>------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 09 2001 - 07:28:20 PDT