Re: LSM Patch Additions for CAPP (C2) Audit Trails

From: jmjonesat_private
Date: Mon Jul 09 2001 - 07:27:27 PDT

  • Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: LSM Patch Additions for CAPP (C2) Audit Trails"

    On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Crispin Cowan wrote:
    
    >    * capabilities:  coarse-grained, authoritative
    >    * others: fine-grained, restrictive
    ...
    > 
    > Permissiveness:  never, except in support of capabilities.
    > 
    
    Yes, I was here for that discussion.  Thank you for a most elegantly
    definitive reduction of the resulting majority consensus.  I believe it
    was needed... with so many animated opinions being expressed and some
    references to extra-list discussions (such as the BoF meeting) it is
    sometimes difficult to determine exactly where the consensus has arrived
    without just such a statement of resolution to "cap it off".
    
    It helps to have a "Clue Stick" that everybody can lift. :-)
    
    Sincerely,
    J. Melvin Jones
    
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  J. MELVIN JONES            jmjonesat_private 
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  Microcomputer Systems Consultant  
    ||  Software Developer
    ||  Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration
    ||  Network and Systems Administration
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  http://www.jmjones.com/
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 09 2001 - 07:28:20 PDT