Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:55:03PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > Greg KH wrote: > > > > > Personally, I have only rejected patches from 1 group (the audit > > > patches), and have gladly applied all others. > > > > > > So where is the problem? > > > > Err, do I really have to answer that one? > > Yes, if you have a problem with the work I have been doing on this > project, please let me know. Without feedback, I have no idea if > someone doesn't like what I am doing, and hence, I will not change my > direction. We keep cutting down the amount of change we ask for to support our policy. Richard's last patch was quite small, but included fds, which some people don't see need for but which we have to have, really. I feels as if our policy requirements are being sacrificed in the name of "concensus", when in fact there is no serious objection, only that some others "don't see the need" for what we require. -- Casey Schaufler Manager, Trust Technology, SGI caseyat_private voice: 650.933.1634 casey_pat_private Pager: 888.220.0607 _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 23 2001 - 16:58:28 PDT