Casey Schaufler wrote: > We keep cutting down the amount of change we ask for to support > our policy. Richard's last patch was quite small, but included > fds, which some people don't see need for but which we have to > have, really. I feels as if our policy requirements are > being sacrificed in the name of "concensus", when in fact > there is no serious objection, only that some others > "don't see the need" for what we require. That depends on the "policy." Audit was placed in Phase 2, because if we put it in Phase 1, the whole of LSM will likely be rejected out of hand. Richard's post seemed to be trying to put some audit stuff back into Phase 1. If you can contrive some access control need for fd's, then we've got something to go on. Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 24 2001 - 01:45:30 PDT