Re: Patch Acceptance Procedure

From: Seth Arnold (sarnoldat_private)
Date: Mon Jul 23 2001 - 17:47:13 PDT

  • Next message: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Patch Acceptance Procedure"

    There were many good points in your article, but this one thing I
    feel needs to be poked at a bit..
    
    On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:29:21PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote:
    > Good.  "Best solution without other options or significant opposition."
    > That's getting somewhere, although it prefers "first in" if nobody else
    > can commit to an alternate solution within one business day.  Practically,
    > that may be the most efficient way to proceed.
    
    Ah, but it isn't about proposing the alternative that quickly. :)
    It is about knowing by the end of a business day whether or not
    another solution should be sought. I don't expect people to have
    many complaints, i.e., I expect this will remain a lightweight
    process above all.
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 23 2001 - 17:44:21 PDT