On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Seth Arnold wrote: > There were many good points in your article, but this one thing I > feel needs to be poked at a bit.. > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:29:21PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote: > > Good. "Best solution without other options or significant opposition." > > That's getting somewhere, although it prefers "first in" if nobody else > > can commit to an alternate solution within one business day. Practically, > > that may be the most efficient way to proceed. > > Ah, but it isn't about proposing the alternative that quickly. :) > It is about knowing by the end of a business day whether or not > another solution should be sought. I don't expect people to have > many complaints, i.e., I expect this will remain a lightweight > process above all. > Okay, replace "can commit to" with "can envision and convincingly posit". :) J. Melvin Jones |>------------------------------------------------------ || J. MELVIN JONES jmjonesat_private |>------------------------------------------------------ || Microcomputer Systems Consultant || Software Developer || Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration || Network and Systems Administration |>------------------------------------------------------ || http://www.jmjones.com/ |>------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 23 2001 - 17:55:25 PDT