jmjonesat_private wrote: > I don't seek to "block" work. What I seek to do is to impose upon the > minds of those coding that their hooks/fixes MAY end up being viewed in > the light of authoritative, and possible DAC-OUT authoritative. IMHO, the "DAC-out" plan doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell. I put the question to Ted just to get a definitive opinion. Even if Ted does come back with "we don't care" (improbable) I still beleive that a solid majority of the LSM implementers are opposed to DAC-out. I think Richard Offer had it right when he suggested thinking about DAC-out for Linux 3.0. If anything, IMHO, that's the earliest it would be considered. Caution: down that road lies Microkernels. Linus hates microkernels. Good luck, you'll need it :-) Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Aug 06 2001 - 10:45:05 PDT