* frm crispinat_private "08/06/01 10:43:46 -0700" | sed '1,$s/^/* /' * * jmjonesat_private wrote: * *> I don't seek to "block" work. What I seek to do is to impose upon the *> minds of those coding that their hooks/fixes MAY end up being viewed in *> the light of authoritative, and possible DAC-OUT authoritative. * * IMHO, the "DAC-out" plan doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell. I put * the question to Ted just to get a definitive opinion. Even if Ted does * come back with "we don't care" (improbable) I still beleive that a solid * majority of the LSM implementers are opposed to DAC-out. * * I think Richard Offer had it right when he suggested thinking about * DAC-out for Linux 3.0. I was being facetious. I still believe its the right thing to do now, that doesn't mean I think it will be done. * * Crispin richard. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard Offer Technical Lead, Trust Technology, SGI "Specialization is for insects" _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Aug 06 2001 - 10:52:31 PDT