Re: quotactl hook

Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Any outstanding patches?"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: quotactl hook"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: quotactl hook"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: quotactl hook"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: quotactl hook"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sdsat_private

On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Chris Wright wrote:

> I am working on a patch to 2.4 that (if i'm lucky) will look like the
> 2.5 changes (moving to dentry/vfsmount instead of inode).

This sounds interesting, but I assume that you'll keep this patch
separate from the main LSM patch.  Is that correct?  I wouldn't
want a rejection of those changes to hamper acceptance of the
LSM patch.

--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalleyat_private

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module