Re: quotactl hook

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Wed Sep 05 2001 - 09:35:59 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: quotactl hook"

    * Stephen Smalley (sdsat_private) wrote:
    > 
    > On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Chris Wright wrote:
    > 
    > > I am working on a patch to 2.4 that (if i'm lucky) will look like the
    > > 2.5 changes (moving to dentry/vfsmount instead of inode).
    > 
    > This sounds interesting, but I assume that you'll keep this patch
    > separate from the main LSM patch.  Is that correct?  I wouldn't
    > want a rejection of those changes to hamper acceptance of the
    > LSM patch.
    
    Of course.  I'm just trying to look forward at the anticipated changes.
    
    -chris
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 05 2001 - 09:44:25 PDT