Re: quotactl hook

Previous message: Casey Schaufler: "Re: quotactl hook"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: quotactl hook"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: quotactl hook"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Stephen Smalley (sdsat_private) wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Chris Wright wrote:
> 
> > I am working on a patch to 2.4 that (if i'm lucky) will look like the
> > 2.5 changes (moving to dentry/vfsmount instead of inode).
> 
> This sounds interesting, but I assume that you'll keep this patch
> separate from the main LSM patch.  Is that correct?  I wouldn't
> want a rejection of those changes to hamper acceptance of the
> LSM patch.

Of course.  I'm just trying to look forward at the anticipated changes.

-chris

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module