GPL only usage of security.h

gregat_private

Hi all,

With the addition of MODULE_LICENSE in 2.4.10, I got to thinking about
the license of our security.h file.  Personally I think closed source
security products are bad things for a variety of reasons, and I think
that most people on this project also agree with me.  Toward that, I've
added a few words to security.h keeping any closed source modules from
using the security module interface to the kernel.

I've attached the patch that I came up with below (and accidentally
committed it to the tree, sorry, I didn't mean to do that without some
discussion first, it can be backed out or changed.)  The wording isn't
the best, but I think it gets the idea across.  Does anyone have any
better wording they can think of for this?

Or does anyone object to this change?

thanks,

greg k-h