So, you're all saying that 1) you've met every condition in Linus' original requirement (included the imbedded systems comment), 100% and without question. 2) you're not willing to actually sell the patch on it's merits, beyond the assertion that it "meets a (differingly interprettable) statement by Linus"? Is Linux really that "ingrown", that two people make all the decisions? I don't know Alan, but I would never believe that of Linus. I truely think that, since the project is near v1.0, there are good reasons to discuss the viability of the solution in a "friendly environment"... before the LD's post questions similar to this mild one. WHY should this be included? Except for "my friend" or "the master" says it might be accepted. Linus (and probably) Alan listen to more voices than their own... this is Open Software! Or, can nobody write a paper that proves the merit? Gonna be a tough fight, If that's the case, J. Melvin Jones |>------------------------------------------------------ || J. MELVIN JONES jmjonesat_private |>------------------------------------------------------ || Microcomputer Systems Consultant || Software Developer || Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration || Network and Systems Administration |>------------------------------------------------------ || http://www.jmjones.com/ |>------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Mar 22 2002 - 13:23:26 PST