Re: [logs] Logging standards?

From: todd glassey (todd.glasseyat_private)
Date: Sun Oct 28 2001 - 11:23:56 PST

  • Next message: Shane Kerr: "Re: [logs] Logging standards?"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "todd glassey" <todd.glasseyat_private>
    To: "Rich Salz" <rsalzat_private>
    Cc: <loganalysisat_private>
    Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 4:33 PM
    Subject: Re: [logs] Logging standards?
    
    
    > Rich - without a reasonable time management and verification regimen
    > Computer Records are only as reliable as the person testifying as to their
    > veracity. Even then, without an accompanying infrastructure that supports
    > their veracity and the audits to say that the systems was/were being
    > operated "properly"... you got squat.(IMHO at least)
    >
    > Personally I think that should be inherently obvious and has always been
    one
    > of the arrogances of Systems Admins as a whole - "the how dare you doubt
    our word"
    
    sorry bout the left out word in the sentence above - "doubt"
    
    > mindset, and I am sorry - it just doesn't wash anymore.
    >
    > These records must in commercial environments stand the test of time and
    > veracity as well and that means that they need significantly more than
    they
    > have today.
    >
    > This is just my opinion of course but I am willing to lay wager on it.
    >
    > Todd
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Rich Salz" <rsalzat_private>
    > To: "todd glassey" <todd.glasseyat_private>
    > Cc: "Carl Husa" <carlhusaat_private>; <loganalysisat_private>
    > Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 3:07 PM
    > Subject: Re: [logs] Logging standards?
    >
    >
    > > >tracking its divergence from UTC during the session?
    > >
    > > Unh, why?
    >
    > because in ten years when I try to corelate them to something that
    happened
    > in another computer I need something that is exactly the same between both
    > systems to link the log events - and that is not the stable ticking of the
    > clocks of these systems, but that they bot have something known in them at
    > the instant of the transaction. So its that time that I am concerned in.
    Now
    > it happens to be a whole lot easier for everyone if the Time used is UTC.
    >
    > >
    > > Most people don't calibrate their watches very often and that's fine for
    > > evidence.
    > >
    > > Relative time, timezones -- not beyond the understanding of the courts.
    > > /r$
    > >
    > > --
    > > Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures,
    > > Encryption)
    > > http://www.zolera.com
    > >
    > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    > > For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    > For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    >
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Oct 28 2001 - 16:58:06 PST