Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court

From: Matt Bing (mbingat_private)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 05:56:21 PST

Next message: Chris Adams: "Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court"

Previous message: Matthew G. Marsh: "[logs] CERT Conference 2002 Call for Presentations"
In reply to: todd glassey: "Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

todd glassey said:
> Bennet's right about PFS - however Perfect Forward Secrecy is a real pain in
> distributed systems to implement, but it is doable.

Schneier and Kelsey wrote a nice paper on cryptographic forward chaining 
of logs:

http://www.counterpane.com/secure-logs.html

and was implemented in nsyslogd:

http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/nsyslog.html

-- 
Matt Bing
NFR Security
Rapid Response Team

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private

Next message: Chris Adams: "Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court"
Previous message: Matthew G. Marsh: "[logs] CERT Conference 2002 Call for Presentations"
In reply to: todd glassey: "Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 06 2001 - 09:30:25 PST