Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court

From: Matt Bing (mbingat_private)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 05:56:21 PST

  • Next message: Chris Adams: "Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court"

    todd glassey said:
    > Bennet's right about PFS - however Perfect Forward Secrecy is a real pain in
    > distributed systems to implement, but it is doable.
    
    Schneier and Kelsey wrote a nice paper on cryptographic forward chaining 
    of logs:
    
    http://www.counterpane.com/secure-logs.html
    
    and was implemented in nsyslogd:
    
    http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/nsyslog.html
    
    -- 
    Matt Bing
    NFR Security
    Rapid Response Team
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 06 2001 - 09:30:25 PST