> > My understanding is that every plugin that was submitted was under GPL, > > and while I might like our company name mentioned in every report of > > everyone out there who runs nessus (and its commercial cousin, NeWT) I > > think it might get clumbersom. > > > Basically, the idea is not to add pages and pages of names (as they can > be found from the report), but basically _remind_ everyone that the > plugins authors have control on the text they write. I agree with you. I don't think we should report every name on every plugin. Too clumbersom. > > (*) This is not the case of everyone. Believe it or not, there is a company > out there which sells Nessus on an appliance and who routinely says during > their training classes that while Marty Roesch is a nice guy (which is true), > I'm evil (which not true - hey, I can be a nice guy). Why ? Because I *dared* > to forbid them to use Nessus.org because while they live off Nessus, there's no > mention of it on their website at all. hey, I mention nessus all the time! (or at least, a lot of the time) -- Michael Scheidell, CEO SECNAP Network Security, LLC Sales: 866-SECNAPNET / (1-866-732-6276) Main: 561-368-9561 / www.secnap.net Looking for a career in Internet security? http://www.secnap.net/employment/ _______________________________________________ Plugins-writers mailing list Plugins-writers@private http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/plugins-writers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Dec 10 2003 - 12:56:05 PST