On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Chris Wright wrote: > in general, throwing out any kernel logic and replacing with hook is not > acceptable. > will not accept the vfs_permission change, > changeattr hook is not acceptable, With all due respect, based on what test(s)? Is there a document that defines the "scope" of LSM yet, or has the "test" been argued narrowly enough to make a statement of it at this point? I ask in an attempt to get a "pre-test" for my code to determine what should be submitted for review to LSM, and what should not. Can anybody state (succinctly) the limits of LSM, yet? Sincerely, J. Melvin Jones _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 05 2001 - 13:47:19 PDT