On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:19:15 EDT, jmjonesat_private said: > Proposed: passing fd's should be supported wherever possible in the > interface and will not constitute the sole reason for a rejection of a > patch. Seconded? I'll conditionally second it. However, could one of the audit people verify that fd's are actually available at most/all of the points they are concerned about, or are there some show-stoppers in there where they need the fd but it isn't actually handy at the moment? If we can just pass the fd where needed at little to no cost, it seems a reasonable thing to do. If however there's significant work needed for some syscall, we need to re-think it.... -- Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 24 2001 - 08:10:33 PDT