On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 09:07:20AM -0400, David Wheeler wrote:
> I'm still interested in completing a stacking module, but
> I have two questions for everyone:
>
> 1. I need the "module id" of a stacked module, if it has one,
> to implement returns from sys_security.
I don't understand why you need this.
The "module id" is _only_ for the module itself, for it to check if the
sys_security call is for itself. It should not be used to determine who
to send the sys_security call to.
> Would anyone (Greg KH?) be willing to ask the question for me on
> the linux kernel mailing list, since I can't seem to post on it?
> ("Are pointer writes atomic on all architectures? If not, on which
> architectures is this assumption true or not true?")
I'm a bit more interested in why you can't post, if you have problems,
please contact the postmaster of vger.kernel.org. I'd rather not be the
go-between :)
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 08:51:49 PDT