Re: fact, fiction, nonetheless...

From: Don Tansey (hyghlanderat_private)
Date: Thu Aug 09 2001 - 21:54:45 PDT

Next message: Ryan Hilton: "Re: [Fwd: Logfiles]"

Previous message: tcleary2at_private: "Re: [Fwd: Logfiles]"
In reply to: sween: "fact, fiction, nonetheless..."
Next in thread: Derek Benson: "Re: fact, fiction, nonetheless..."
Reply: Derek Benson: "Re: fact, fiction, nonetheless..."
Reply: W. Reilly Cooley, Esq.: "Re: fact, fiction, nonetheless..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

<snip>> So: if I had a logging server that centralized the logs, in the
event of
> intrusion, the authorities would just confiscate IT... right?</snip>


While I have heard tales of confiscating the perpetrator's machines
I have never heard of the _victims_ machines being lifted.

Perhaps some of the "authorities" on the list would care to comment?

Cheers,
D





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private

Next message: Ryan Hilton: "Re: [Fwd: Logfiles]"
Previous message: tcleary2at_private: "Re: [Fwd: Logfiles]"
In reply to: sween: "fact, fiction, nonetheless..."
Next in thread: Derek Benson: "Re: fact, fiction, nonetheless..."
Reply: Derek Benson: "Re: fact, fiction, nonetheless..."
Reply: W. Reilly Cooley, Esq.: "Re: fact, fiction, nonetheless..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 09 2001 - 21:58:31 PDT