Re: Article: Honesty isn't a policy, laid-off techies say

From: ari (edelkindat_private)
Date: Wed Jul 18 2001 - 09:56:57 PDT

  • Next message: Ken Pfeil: "RE: Article: Honesty isn't a policy, laid-off techies say"

    Note this, however.  If you give notice and as a result are immediately
    escorted off the premises, you should still be on payroll and hence will
    be paid during your final two weeks.  If your superiors decide to fire you
    at that time in lieu of keeping you on payroll, the company owes you a
    severance package.
    
    Unless you signed something explicitly waiving your rights to this, you
    may sue your employer for rightful compensation.
    
    ari
    
    
    Tom.Litneyat_private said this stuff:
    
    > As a security expert or critical infrastructure employee you should expect
    > to be immediately walked of the premise and have all remote access disable
    > at the point of termination.  You might be expected to immediately pack your
    > personal possession with a guard in presence or have your possessions packed
    > for you by your line manager.  This is normal practice.  I'm not defending
    > it but have enforced it in practice and required it in security policy.  Of
    > course, prior notification of pending termination would not be given.  If
    > you are an employee with sensitive access and give your notice, don't be
    > surprised if you are immediately walked of the premise.  Try not to take it
    > personally.  Of course you wouldn't do something to detrimentally affect the
    > corporation but others do not have those same high standards.  In our line
    > of work it comes with the territory.  I mentioned the deviation from policy
    > at my last position, when I gave notice and wasn't immediately escorted off
    > the premise.  They felt I could be trusted (and of course were correct).  I
    > had critical knowledge and they sucked everything out of me they could in my
    > final two weeks.  But don't count on this to happen as it should be the
    > exception.
    > 
    > Tom
    > 
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Meritt James [mailto:meritt_jamesat_private]
    > > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:20 AM
    > > To: securityjobsat_private
    > > Subject: Article: Honesty isn't a policy, laid-off techies say
    > >
    > >
    > > http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-6580080.html?tag=mn_hd%20arg
    > >
    > > And as a "security expert" somebody may be looking over your shoulder
    > > every moment until an armed guard escorts you off the premises.
    > >
    > > At least, that is what happened to me.  Perfectly reasonable - I knew
    > > too much and could have zeroed multiple programs.  Wouldn't, but that is
    > > a different topic...
    > >
    > >
    > > --
    > > James W. Meritt, CISSP, CISA
    > > Booz, Allen & Hamilton
    > > phone: (410) 684-6566
    > >
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jul 18 2001 - 10:19:41 PDT